tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2605473581323847466.post3664981078428792169..comments2023-06-23T18:56:51.797+08:00Comments on The CCIE Journey: Happy New YearNickelbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04542984307013198265noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2605473581323847466.post-47937493224867904592009-01-05T14:55:00.000+08:002009-01-05T14:55:00.000+08:00Mine won't be that technical though so I guess it'...Mine won't be that technical though so I guess it's a lot more easier than coming up with a technical post.<BR/><BR/>I am however, very interested when your article on the Nexus comes out :-). Putting up some WireShark captures would be perfect. It gives the rest of us to play around with more packet captures :0Nickelbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04542984307013198265noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2605473581323847466.post-26455728812359856482009-01-02T20:40:00.000+08:002009-01-02T20:40:00.000+08:00I haven't got a clue what to write on the video IP...I haven't got a clue what to write on the video IP theme for CCIE Flyer. Just not in my wheelhouse. I'm probably going in a different direction. Been working on an Nexus platform write-up, so I think I'll finish that up. But I don't think I can tie that article into video, other than to mention just how many streams you can push through a loaded Nexus 7000 chassis.<BR/><BR/>Although...I was running Cacti at the house yesterday, monitoring the bandwidth consumed while streaming video via a file share to the XBOX using XBMC. Maybe if I compare streaming video via SMB (what I'm doing now) vs. XBMS (I have no idea how to even set up)? Hmm, throw some WireShark captures in there, and that might be interesting. SMB is such a pig, that a purpose-built media streaming protocol should be a lot more efficient.Ethan Bankshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16319332239936292387noreply@blogger.com